review: City Life

City Life: Urban Expectations In A New WorldCity Life: Urban Expectations In A New World by Witold Rybczynski
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

I liked Rybczynski’s book “Home” which observed how comfort, family life, privacy, efficiency (damn those Victorians) and work have shaped the idea of home.

“City Life” is an excellent overview of how Americans have evolved the modern culture of cities which remains one of our few last exports to the rest of the world.

He makes many useful observations:
The evolving definition of city, or town or burg. The word city comes from towns that had bishopric seats, and had nothing to do with population. In general, it had religious connotations. gulp.
That Americans simply brought their urban culture to the rural communities. Therefore, it follows that we don’t have the parallel cultures that much of Europe has still but instead share more within the building blocks of each community.
Maybe there is hope for us.
Unfortunately, I think much of what we now share across the nation starts with American Idol and ends with WalMart.
That many universities were built by architects as self-contained towns with a rich patron to bankroll the ideas and had little or no opposition to their ideas. That made me pause; since almost all architects and planners come from those environs, it occurs to me that their last experience of village life before designing them are these mock towns that believe wholeheartedly in the built environment and most often in a sort of medieval spires and green field view of life.
Uh oh.
But the most important part of this book for me is his chapter on housing for the poor and the great migration (great meaning whole bunches) of African-Americans to the Northern manufacturing areas. As we need to remember, the post war boom was basically over by the mid-1960s and yet no changes were made in the policies of the US for those who migrated to where the jobs once were. Housing for the poor reflected that missed opportunity and still does.
I wish this part was longer but at least he attempts to add it to the conversation. That accessibility is still the main reason for city life I agree with but not sure that I agree that with wireless accessibility, fewer physical cities may need to exist. That may be true, although I feel that theory has been preached since the 19th century (and its advent of the ” annihilation of time and distance” with the invention of the telegraph, railroad and photography) yet cities continued to grow in importance and size in that very time.

I also wish there was more on the immigrant experience and how it has changed in America and therefore changed cities too. I know that in my own city newly arriving immigrants are now moving to the suburbs of Jefferson Parish as soon as they arrive and not to the city center which worries me. I’d like to hear some perspective on that.
Rybczynski writes well for a wide audience and gives concrete examples of places that illustrate his points.
You can do worse than reading this primer, especially if you are new to the subject or prefer less academic views of heavy subjects, like me.

View all my reviews

Advertisements

About DW

New Orleans resident, writer, activist. Public market consultant.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s